Friday, February 28, 2025

Something to think about (Updated again!)

The negative reaction to President Trump's public humiliation of Ukraine's President Zelensky in the White House last month is intense and widespread. Though Trumpers claim to understand what the president was trying to achieve- something to do with U.S. pride or saving money- many feel he's more like a crazed person breaking out of an asylum with a sledgehammer, then bashing everything he sees, whether a federal agency or established foreign policy.

But the crazed person view, convincing though it is, does not tell the whole story. It does not explain what Trump is doing in the practical world. For a clue to what he's aiming for from the Russia/Ukraine war, look to Trump's main advisor and financial supporter, Elon Musk, owner of Tesla, who complains that the price of lithium (in plentiful supply in Ukraine), which he needs for Tesla batteries, "...has gone to insane levels! Tesla might actually have to get into mining and refining directly." In the same week, Trump, with Musk at his side, lined up Tesla models in front of the White House and used the presidency to do a car commercial. Translating this sensitivity to corporate need into foreign policy, Trump switched sides in the Russia/Ukraine war, now favoring Russia, in an attempt to maneuver Ukraine's mineral deposits into Russian hands because, as he explained, "...it may be easier to deal with Russia." [Update, 3/30/25: Trump appears to have switched sides again, this time in favor of Ukraine, and is "very angry" at Putin, but it's a show. Russia will end up with significant mineral deposits in contested areas.] In essence, the president is replacing rule by traditional government, which is accountable to some extent to voters, with rule by corporations, accountable to their boards to make a profit.

[Aside: I try not to get upset when the administration appears fearless of public opinion, as it does with such blatant acts of conflict of interest, because we're supposed to get upset; that's part of the plan. Trump and Musk get a kick out of it, saying, "Look at those dumb asses getting upset, and they can't do a thing about it! Ha! Ha! Ha! If they keep it up, we'll just say that China is getting all the lithium and if we don't do something they'll win the whole world and we'll be their slaves!"]

Most American network news and newspapers have been excoriating Trump over the spectacle of the White House exchange with Zelensky, and it's a safe bet that the architects of the new Ukraine/Russia policy do not like the flak. The Trump administration has for weeks been assaulting national media with lawsuits against their corporate owners- even threats of jailtime- and threats to broadcast licenses, but public visibility and private ownership have made the media less immediately vulnerable to executive branch invasion than federal agencies have been. Private networks like CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN and PBS (run by a non-profit corporation), as well as the nation's privately owned newspapers and magazines, have had a few week's immunity from the severe blows to come, and they've used it to air hard-hitting and persistent criticism of Trump. Many prominent media commentators now depict him as a would-be autocrat in the fashion of Russian president Putin, prepared to use any method to subdue critics. If they are right, the coming crescendo of Trump criticism triggered by the combined impact of his many dislocating policies will lead to increasingly dramatic blows against the media (Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg may be in the early crosshairs). Consider this: How would Putin react if most of the Russian media attacked him every night? We know how he would react: something untimely would befall the Russian media.

If American media buckles and accepts censorship of anti-administration commentary, much of the public will notice (certainly everyone who watches 60 Minutes will notice), and this could generate enough protest to slow down the process, or even prevail and sustain America's remarkably free press. If Trump's war on media faces strong enough opposition, he will need a big distraction to get away with it, big enough so people won't notice if David Muir starts praising Putin. What distraction could be big enough to provide that degree of cover? Looking at this morning's news, I'm guessing the distraction will be everything everywhere falling to hell at the same time.

Check out my guest commentary, "What is our ideology?", on Harry the Human's blog: http://harrythehuman.harrythehumanpoliticalthoughtsfrombeyondthepale.com/

Also, check out Harry the Human's and Gregory's revolution at http://www.gregorysarmyoftheyoung.com/

My new blog!

Dear Readers, I've created a new blog, AI conversations , between me and Google's AI, Gemini. We discuss sex, politics and consci...